Print

Decision on termination of criminal case following murder of young man repealed

30 November 2016

As a result of the interference of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Russia the right of a resident of Tuva to access to justice has been reinstated. The decision on termination of criminal case following the murder of her son has been repealed and an additional investigation is being conducted.

In September 2016, resident of Tuva M. appealed to the High Commissioner with a request to assist to restore the justice and punish the guilty of her only son’s death. The applicant complained on prejudicial treatment of the investigators, official red tape, and unjustified termination of criminal case.

On 17 November 2014, as a result of a conflict the applicant's son O. was killed and his friend V. was seriously injured. On the same day, the investigating authorities launched a criminal case following the murder; however, the suspect was charged only six months after the tragic events. In February 2015, a criminal case was opened following the inflicting grievous bodily harm upon V. Later, two criminal cases were taken in one proceedings.

During the preliminary investigation, the decision to terminate the criminal case following the murder of O. had been made five times in a row; and several months later, both cases were closed due to the absence of corpus delicti. The complainant could not agree with the decision, and appealed to the prosecutorial authorities and the Tuva Republic Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia. However, there were no positive results.

Having considered the case materials, the High Commissioner found a number of violations of criminal and criminal procedure legislation and appealed to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation. In particular, the High Commissioner requested to examine the complainant’s arguments about the gross violations of choosing the measure of restraint for suspects, conducting fingerprint identification of the weapon of crime, interviewing the witnesses, victims and a suspect, as well as of registration of the procedural documents.

The response of the Deputy Chairman of the Investigative Committee of Russia reported that the Head of the Tuva Republic Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia had been instructed to conduct a “full and adequate inspection of the legitimacy” of the decision on termination of the criminal case.

As a result of the initiated inspection, the decision on termination of the criminal case was withdrawn and an additional investigation was organised. The progress and results of the investigation are followed up by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Russia.

We did it...
Dialogue with High Commissioner. Ownership

Dialogue with High Commissioner. Ownership

15 November 2019
In our state, the inviolability of private property is protected by law, but even it sometimes cannot stop scammers striving to cash in on someone’s grief. I was approached by a resident of the city of Shakhty, Rostov Region. Plotters misappropriated her home by forging of documents. The woman wrote to various authorities but could not achieve justice. The police initiated criminal proceedings, but the process was…
Dialogue with High Commissioner. Marriage abroad

Dialogue with High Commissioner. Marriage abroad

12 November 2019
Perhaps one of the most difficult tasks in my work is to protect our compatriots abroad. Indeed, each country has its laws, its rules, and compromise can only be achieved through dialogue. I received an appeal from a citizen of the Russian Federation who married on the territory of Kyrgyzstan. The circumstances were such that the couple divorced (also outside our country)…

Dialogue with society. Gratitude of businessman

13 December 2018
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation receives many letters of thanks to the Federal Ombudsman, Tatiana Moskalkova: Dear Tatiana Nikolaevna! I want to express my sincere gratitude to you and your Office for their support and professional assistance in preserving the good name of the company «F." and our property from illegal actions…
We did it...